The pragmatic functions of the marker "sawa" in spoken Swahili
Keywords:pragmatic markers, spoken Swahili, contextualization theory
This study examines the pragmatic functions of the marker sawa in spoken Swahili. The data have been obtained from informal conversations made by Swahili speakers in informal social settings. These settings include “vijiwe vya kahawa” (setting of informal conversations created around people drinking coffee) and "vijiwe vya mamantilie” (setting of informal conversations created around women preparing and selling food on the streets). The analysis of the data, performed within the framework of the contextualization theory (Gumperz 1982), shows that, apart from its basic connotation of agreement, the marker sawa conveys other meanings, depending on these very contexts of communication, and therefore acquires also various pragmatic functions. The pragmatic functions identified in this work include: to show that the speaker agrees with what has been said but on a condition (I agree, but…), as a receipt marker, as a tag-positioned-comprehension check, as an answer to the question showing that the speaker has understood what has been said (Yes, I understand), as a continuer, as a negative releasing marker, and as a gap filler. Interestingly, the study shows also that intonation and other paralinguistic features (like gestures) play a role in determining the pragmatic functions of this marker. The article concludes that the pragmatic markers in spoken Swahili are rich in meanings and are used to show speakers’ attitudes and emotions, therefore manifesting a deep and meaningful interconnection between the language and its contextualized experience.
Abraham, Werner (ed.). 1991. Discourse Particles. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Adegbija, E & J. Bello. 2001. “The Semantics of ‘okay’ (‘OK’) in Nigerian English”. World Englishes. 20(1). 89-98.
Alami, M. 2015. “Pragmatic Functions of Discourse Marker: A Review of Related Literature”. International Journal on Studies in English Language and Literature (IJSELL) 3(3). 1-10.
Alami, M. 2016. “An Investigation of Pragmatic Functions and Position of Prevalent Persian Discourse Markers Used in Casual Conversation among Tehrani Speakers”. International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature 5(1). 250-263.
Archakis, A. 2001. “On Discourse Markers: Evidence from Modern Greek”. Katika Journal of Pragmatics. 33(8). 1235-1261.
Azi, Y. 2018. “Investigating Arabic Pragmatic Markers in Spoken Discourse”. International Journal of Linguistics. 10 (2). 48-72.
BAKITA. 2017. Kamusi Kuu ya Kiswahili. 2nd Edition. Nairobi: Longhorn Publishers Limited.
BAKIZA. 2010. Kamusi la Kiswahili Fasaha. Nairobi: Oxford University Press.
Barske, T. 2009. “Same Token Different Actions: A Conversation Analytic Study of Social Roles, Embodied Actions and ‘ok’ in German Business Meetings”. Journal of Business Communication 46(1). 120-149.
Bazanella, C. 1990. “Phatic Connectives as Intonational Cues in Contemporary Spoken Italian”. Journal of Pragmatics 14(4). 629-647.
Beach, W. 1993. “Transitional Regularities for “Causal” ‘okay’ Usages”. Journal of Pragmatics 19. 325-352.
Beach, W. 1995. “Preserving and Constraining Options: “Okays” and “Official” Priorities in Medical Interviews”. The Talk of the Clinic, ed. by G.H. Morris, R.J. Chenail. New York: Lawrence Erlbaum. 259-290.
Blakemore, J. 1989. “Meaning and Force: The Pragmatics of Performative Utterances”. Mind & language 4(3). 235-245.
Brinton, L.J. 1996. Pragmatic Markers in English: Grammaticalization and Discourse Functions. Berlin – New York: Walter de Gruyter.
Chen, Y. & A.W. He. 2001. “’Dui Bu Dui’ as Pragmatic Markers. Evidence from Chinese Classroom Discourse”. Journal of Pragmatics 33. 1441-1465.
Condon, S. 2001. “Discourse ‘ok’ Revisited: Default Processes in Verbal Interaction”. Journal of Pragmatics 33(4). 491-513.
Condon, Sh. 1986. “The discourse functions of ‘OK’”. Semiotica 60. 73-101.
Durán, M.E. & V. Unamuno. 2001. “The Discourse Marker ‘a ver’ (Catalan, aveure) in Teacher-Student interaction”. Journal of Pragmatics 33. 193-208.
Erman, B. 1987. Pragmatic Expressions in English: A study of „you know”, „you see” and „I mean” in face-to-face conversation. Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell International.
Filipi, A. & R. Wales. 2003. “Differential Uses of ‘okay’, ‘right’ and ‘alright’, and Their Function in Signaling Perspective Shift or Maintenance in a Map Task”. Semiotica 147. 429-455.
Fraser, B. 1996. “Pragmatic Markers?”. Pragmatics 6 (2). 167-190.
Fung, L. & R. Carter. 2007. “Discourse Markers and Spoken English: Native and Learner Use in Pedagogical Settings”. Applied Linguistics 28(3). 410-439.
Gaines, P. 2011. “The Multifunctionality of Discourse Operator ‘okay’: Evidence From a Police Interview”. Journal of Pragmatics 43. 3291-3315.
Gicharu, J.M. 2015. Kamusi Kuu ya Kiswahili. Nairobi: Longhorn Publishers Limited.
Gumperz, J. 1982. Discourse Strategies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Guthrie, A.M., 1997. “On The Systematic Deployment of ‘okay’ and ‘mmhmm’ in Academic Advising Sessions”. Pragmatics 7(3). 397-415.
Habwe, J.H. 1999. Discourse Analysis of Swahili Political Speeches. PhD Thesis. University of Nairobi.
Heisler, T. 1996. “’OK’ – A Dynamic Discourse Marker in Montreal French”. Sociolinguistics, ed. by J. Arnold, R. Blake, B. Davidson et al.
Hoek, J. 2013. Yeah no, I agree? The Interpretation of Yes and No in Dutch. Unpublished MA Thesis. Nijmegen University.
Kovarsky, D. 1989. “On the Occurrence of ‘okay’ in Therapy”. Child Language Teaching and Therapy 5. 137-145.
Levin, H. & D. Gray. 1983. “The Lecturer’s ‘OK’”. American Speech 58(3). 195-200.
Maschler, Y., 2005. “Accepting while Shifting: The Discourse Marker ‘tov’ (‘okay, fine’, lit. ‘good’) in Israeli Hebrew Talk-In-Interaction”. Proceedings of the Twelfth Annual Symposium About Language and Society. 48:216-228.
Nasir, S.H. 2017. The Interpretation of Discourse Markers ya ‘yes’ and nggak ‘no’ in Indonesia. Unpublished MA Thesis. Radboud University.
O’Neal, G.C. 2013. Teological and Dolichological Discourse Marking in Oral American Media: The Discourse Markers ‘so’ and ‘ok’. Unpublished PhD Thesis. University of London.
Ostman, J.O. 1983. You Know: A Discourse Functional Approach. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Psathas, G. & T. Anderson. 1993. “The Practices of Transcription in Conversation Analysis”. Semiotica 78(1-2). 75-99.
Redeker, G. 1991. “Linguistic markers of discourse structure”. Linguistics 29. 1139-1172.
Schegloff, E. A. & H. Sacks, 1973. “Opening Up Closings”. Semiotica 8(4). 289-327.
Schiffrin, D. 1987. Discourse Markers. Cambridge: CUP.
Schleef, E. 2008. “The ‘‘lecturer’s OK’’ Revisited: Changing Discourse Conventions and the Influence of Academic Division”. American Speech 83(1). 62-84.
Schourup, L. 1999. “Discourse Markers”. Lingua 107. 227-265.
Stede, M. & B. Schmitz. 2000. “Discourse Particles and Discourse Functions”. Katika Machine Translation 15. 125-147.
Susan, D.A. 1999. The Pragmatics of Selected Discourse Markers in Swahili. Unpublished PhD Thesis. University of Illinois.
TUKI. 2012. Kamusi ya Kiswahili Sanifu. 3rd Edition. Dar es Salaam. Oxford University Press.
Wamitila, K.W. 2018. Kamusi Pevu ya Kiswahili, 2nd Edition. Nairobi: Vide~Muwa Publishers Limited.
Wang, Y.-F., Tsai, P.-H. & D. Goodman. 2010. “Agreement, Acknowledgement and Alignment: The Discourse Pragmatic Functions of ‘hao’ and ‘dui’ in Taiwan Mandarin
Conversation”. Discourse Studies 12(2). 241-267.
Yang, Jyh-Her & Liao, Yuan-fu & Wang, Yih-Ru & Chen, Sin-Horng. 2006. A New Approach of Using Temporal Information in Mandarin Speech Recognition (conference paper).
Yilmaz, E. 2002. A Practical Analysis of Turkish Discourse Markers: ‘yan’, ‘iste’ and ‘sey’. Unpublished PhD Thesis. Middle East Technical University.
How to Cite
Copyright (c) 2019 Studies in African Languages and Cultures
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
The SALC is a BOAI-compliant open access journal. The journal content is freely available on the journal website. All journal content appears on the licence Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0)
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of the first publication, the work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
Authors are required to sign and send copies of Article Publishing Agreement and Fields of Exploitation statement prior to article's publication.