Conceptualizations of head in Dholuo
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32690/56.3Keywords:
head, body, conceptualization, embodiment, metaphor, metonymyAbstract
The role of the body in human perception of the surroundings has been continually investigated in the recent past. It has been influenced by the embodiment hypothesis which holds that the human body provides the very first experience that humans have about their environments. This article brings evidence from Dholuo that the head is conceptualized in various ways like metonymic head for hair, head for person, head for character traits, unit of measurement. Metaphorically, the head is extended to mean reason, emotion, container, tool, memory, among others. These findings show that the head is highly polysemous in Dholuo.
References
Abudho, R.A. 2004. A morphosyntactic analysis of Dholuo coordinate and subordinate complex sentences. Unpublished MA Thesis. University of Nairobi.
Andersen, E. 1978. “Lexical universals of body-part terminology”. Universals of human language. Vol. 3. Word structure, ed. by J.H. Greenberg. Stanford: Stanford University Press. 335-368.
Atoh, F.O. 2001. Semantic analysis of Dholuo nouns: The semantic field approach. Unpublished MA Thesis. University of Nairobi.
Baranyiné Kóczy, J. 2019. “‘He cracked his head feverishly’: Conceptualizations of head and thinking in Hungarian”. Embodiment in cross-linguistic studies: The ‘head’, ed. by I. Kraska-Szlenk. Leiden: Brill. 219-244.
Barcelona, A. 2003. “On the plausibility of claiming a metonymic motivation for conceptual metaphor”. Metaphor and metonymy at the crossroads. A cognitive perspective, ed. by A. Barcelona. Berlin, New York: Mouton de Gruyter. 31-58.
Berthoz, A., W. Graf & P.P. Vidal, eds. 1992. The head-neck sensory motor system. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Brdar, M., & R. Brdar-Szabó. 2007. “When Zidane is not simply Zidane, and Bill Gates is not just Bill Gates, or some thoughts on online construction of metaphtonymic meanings of proper names”. Aspects of meaning construction, ed. by G. Radden, K.-M. Köpcke, T. Berg, & P. Siemund. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 125-142.
Brdar-Szabó, R., & M. Brdar, 2011. “What do metonymic chains reveal about the nature of metonymy?” Defining metonymy in cognitive linguistics: Towards a consensus view, ed. by R. Benczes, A. Barcelona, & F. Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 217-248.
Brenzinger, M. & I. Kraska-Szlenk, eds. 2014. The body in language: Comparative studies of linguistic embodiment. Leiden: Brill.
Brown, C.H. 1976. “General principles of human anatomical partonomy and speculations on the growth of partonomic nomenclature”. American Anthropologist 3. 400-24.
Brown, C.H. & S.R. Witkowski. 1981. “Figurative language in a universalist perspective”. American Ethnologist 8(3). 596-615.
Croft, W. 1993. “The role of domains in the interpretation of metaphors and metonymies”. Cognitive Linguistics 4. 335-370.
Enfield, N.J., A. Majid & M. van Staden. 2006. “Cross-linguistic categorization of the body: Introduction”. Language Sciences. 28(2-3). 137-147.
De Mendoza Ibáñez, F.J.R., & O.I.D. Velasco, 2002. “Patterns of conceptual interaction”. Metaphor and metonymy in comparison and contrast, ed. by R. Dirven, & R. Pörings. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. 489-532.
Geeraerts, D. 1994. “Metonymy”. The encyclopedia of language and linguistics. Vol. 5. 2477-2478.
Gibbs, R.W., Jr. 1994. Embodiment and cognitive science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Gibbs, R.W., Jr. 1999. “Taking metaphor out of our heads and putting it into the cultural world”. Metaphor in cognitive linguistics, ed. by R.W. Gibbs, Jr., G.J. Steen. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 145-166.
Gibbs, R.W., Jr. 2006. The poetics of the mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Goossens, L. 1990. “Metaphtonymy: The interaction of metaphor and metonymy in expressions for linguistic action”. Cognitive Linguistics 1(3). 323-340.
Goossens, L. 2002. “Metaphtonymy: The interaction of metaphor and metonymy in expressions for linguistic action”. Metaphor and metonymy in comparison and contrast, ed. by R. Dirven & R. Pörings. Berlin, New York: Mouton de Gruyter. 159-174.
Greenberg, J.H. 1966. Language universals. The Hague, Paris: Mouton.
Haspelmath, M. 2004. “On directionality in language change with particular reference to grammaticalization”. Typological studies in language, ed. by O. Fischer, M. Norde & H. Perridon. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 17-44.
Heine, B. 1997. Cognitive foundations of grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Heine, B., C. Ulrike & H. Friederike. 1991b. Grammaticalization: A conceptual framework. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Heine, B. & T. Kuteva. 2002. World lexicon of grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Heine, B., U. Claudi & F. Hünnemeyer. 1991. “From cognition to grammar: Evidence from African languages”. Approaches to grammaticalization. Vol. 1. Theoretical and ethodological issues 19(1). 149-187.
Hilpert, M. 2007. “Chained metonymies in lexicon and grammar: A crosslinguistic perspective on body part terms”. Aspects of meaning construction, ed. by G. Radden, K.‑M. Köpcke, T. Berg & P. Siemund. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 77-98.
Ibarretxe-Antuñano, I. 2012. “The importance of unveiling conceptual metaphors in a minority language: The case of Basque”. Endangered metaphors, ed. by A. Idström & E. Piirainen in cooperation with T.F.M. Falzett. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 253-273.
Johnson, M. 1987. The body in the mind. The bodily basis of meaning, imagination and reason. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Kenya National Bureau of Statistics. 2019. Kenya population and housing census. Vol. 1. Population by county and sub‑county. Nairobi Government Press.
King, B. 1989. The conceptual structure of emotional experience in Chinese. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation. The Ohio State University.
Kövecses, Z. 1995. “Anger: Its language, conceptualization, and physiology in the light of cross-cultural evidence”. Language and the cognitive construal of the world, ed. by J. R. Taylor & R. E. MacLaury. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 181-96.
Kövecses, Z. 2000. Metaphor and emotion: Language, culture and the body in human feeling. Cambridge: Cambrigde University Press.
Kövecses, Z. 2005. Metaphor in culture: Universality and variation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kövecses, Z. 1986. Metaphors of anger, pride and love: A lexical approach to the structure of concepts. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Kraska-Szlenk, I. 2014a. “Extending body-part terms in the domain of emotions”. The body in language, ed. by M. Brenzinger & I. Kraska-Szlenk. Leiden: Brill. 52-70.
Kraska-Szlenk, I. 2014b. “Semantic extensions of body part terms: Common patterns and their interpretation”. Language Sciences 44. 15-39.
Kraska-Szlenk, I., ed. 2020. Body part terms in conceptualization and language usage. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Kraska-Szlenk, I., ed. 2019. Embodiment in cross-linguistic studies: The ‘head’. Leiden: Brill.
Lakoff, G. & M. Johnson. 1980. Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Lakoff, G. & M. Turner. 1989. More than cool reason: A field guide to poetic metaphor. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Lakoff, G. & Z. Kövecses. 1987. “The cognitive model of anger inherent in American English”. Cultural models in language and thought, ed. by D. Holland & N. Quinn. New York, Cambridge University Press. 195-221.
Langacker, R.W. 1987. Foundations of cognitive grammar. Vol. 1. Theoretical prerequisites. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Maalej, Z. 2014. “Body parts we live by in language and culture: The raas ‘head’ and yidd ‘hand’ in Tunisian Arabic”. The body in language, ed. by M. Brenzinger & I. Kraska-Szlenk. Leiden: Brill. 224-259.
Maalej, Z. 2004. “Figurative language in anger expressions in Tunisian Arabic: An extended view of embodiment”. Metaphor and Symbol 19(1). 51-75.
Maalej, Z. 2008. “The heart and cultural embodiment in Tunisian Arabic”. Culture, body, and language: Conceptualizations of internal body organs across cultures and languages, ed. by F. Sharifian, R. Dirven, N. Yu & S. Niemeier. Berlin, New York: Mouton de Gruyter. 395-428.
Maalej, Z. & N. Yu. 2011. “Introduction: Embodiment via body parts”. Embodiment via body parts. Studies from various languages and cultures, ed. by Z. Maalej & N. Yu. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 1-20.
Majid, A. 2010. “Words for parts of the body”. Words and the mind: How words capture human experience, ed. by B.C. Malt & P. Wolff. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press.
Mandler, J.M. 1984. Stories, scripts and scenes: Aspects of schema theory. Hillsdale, New Jersey: Erlbaum.
Mol, S. 2004. “Head and heart: Metaphors and metonymies in a cross-linguistic perspective”. Translation and corpora: Selected papers from Goteborg-Oslo Symposium, 18‑19 October 2003, ed. by K. Aijmer & H. Haselgard. Göteborg: Acta Universitatis Gothoburgensis. 87-111.
Nerlich, B. & D.D. Clarke. 2001. “Serial metonymy: A study of reference-based polysemisation”.
Journal of Historical Pragmatics 2(2). 245-272. Online: https://doi.org/10.1075/jhp.2.2.04ner [10.07.2022].
Niemeier, S. 2008. “To be in control: Kind-hearted and cool-headed. The head‑heart dichotomy in English”. Culture, body, and language: Conceptualizations of internal body organs across cultures and languages, ed. by F. Sharifian, R. Dirven, N. Yu & S. Niemeier.
-372.
Ochieng, J.J. 2016. A linguistic analysis of the metaphorical euphemisms used in Dholuo HIV/AIDS discourse. Unpublished MA Thesis. University of Nairobi.
Oduol, J.H.A. 1990. Dholuo dialects: Synchronic state and some historical inferences. Unpublished Ph.D. Thesis. University of Nairobi.
Oduor, J.A. 2002. A study of syllable weight and its effects in Dholuo phonology. Unpublished Ph.D. Thesis. University of Nairobi.
Okombo, O.D. 1986. The functional paradigm of Dholuo constituent order. Nairobi: University of Nairobi.
Okoth, O.D. 1982. Dholuo morphophonemics in a Generative framework. Berlin: Dietrich Reimer Verlag.
Radden, G. 2000. “How metonymic are metaphors”. Metaphor and metonymy at the crossroads. A cognitive perspective, ed. by A. Barcelona. Berlin, New York: Mouton de Gruyter. 93-108.
Radden, G., & Z, Kövecses. 1999. “Towards a theory of metonymy”. Metonymy in language and thought, ed. by P. Klaus Uwe & G. Radden. Amsterdam. Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 17-60.
Reddy, M. 1979. “The conduit metaphor: A case of frame conflict in our language about language”. Metaphor and thought, ed. by A. Ortony. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 284-324.
Rohrer, T. 2007. “Embodiment and experientialism”. The Oxford handbook of cognitive linguistics, ed. by D. Geeraerts & H. Cuyckens. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 25-47.
Ruiz de Mendoza, F. J. 2000. “The role of mappings and domains in understanding metonymy”. Metonymy and metaphor at the crossroads, ed. by A. Barcelona. Berlin, New York: Mouton de Gruyter. 109-132.
Sharifian, F. 2008. “Conceptualizations of del ‘heart-stomach’ in Persian”. Culture, body, and language: Conceptualizations of internal body organs across cultures and languages, ed. by F. Sharifian, R. Dirven, N. Yu & S. Niemeier. Berlin, New York: Mouton de Gruyter. 247-265.
Sharifian, F. 2011. Cultural conceptualisations and language: Theoretical framework and applications. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Sharifian, F. 2017. Cultural linguistics. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Sharifian, F. et al., eds. 2008. Culture, body, and language: Conceptualizations of internal body organs across cultures and languages. Berlin, New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Sharifian, F., R. Dirven, N. Yu, & S. Niemeier, eds. 2008. Culture, body, and language: Conceptualizations of internal body organs across cultures and languages. Berlin, New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Siahaan, P. 2011. “Head and eye in German and Indonesian figurative uses”. Embodiment via body parts. Studies from various languages and cultures, ed. by Z. Maalej & N. Yu. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins 93-114.
Stafford R.L. 1967. An elementary Luo grammar with vocabularies. Nairobi: Oxford University Press.
Talmy, L. 1983. “How language structures space”. Spatial orientation: Theory, research, and application, ed. by L.P. Herbert Jr. & L. Acredolo. New York: Plenum Press. 225-282.
Traugott, E.C., & B. Heine. 1991. Approaches to grammaticalization. Vol. 2. Types of grammatical markers 19(2). Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Wierzbicka, A. 2007. “Bodies and their parts: An NSM approach to semantic typology”. Language Sciences 29(1). 14-65.
Wilkins, D. 1996. “Natural tendencies of semantic change and the search for cognates”. The comparative method reviewed, ed. by M. Durie & M. Ross. New York, Oxford: Oxford University Press. 264-304.
Will, I. 2019. “The conceptualization of HEAD among the Hausa based on verbal and nonverbal representations”. Embodiment in cross-linguistic studies, ed. by I. Kraska-Szlenk. Leiden: Brill. 157-182.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 University of Warsaw Press
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
The SALC is a BOAI-compliant open access journal. The journal content is freely available on the journal website. All journal content appears on the licence Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0)
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of the first publication, the work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
Authors are required to sign and send copies of Article Publishing Agreement and Fields of Exploitation statement prior to article's publication.
