The polysemy of body part terms in Hausa within the frame of Image Schemas

Authors

  • Tijjani Shehu Almajir Bayero University, Kano

Keywords:

body part, compositional polysemy, semantic extension, metonymy, Hausa

Abstract

Body part-terms have been identified as a productive source of figurative lexical meanings as well as grammatical meanings (Heine, et al. 1991). The paper adopts descriptive lexical semantics as a model of approach. This paves the way to examine the relationships that exist between different interpretations of words. Virtually, every language exhibits rich set of semantic extensions of body part-terms, highlighting the importance of the human body for lexical and grammatical structure (Lakoff and Johnson, 1980). Most meaning extensions of body part-terms can be shown to have a clear motivation through either metaphor or metonymy, as has been argued in many studies before (Allan, 1995). The paper provides a rich inventory of body part-terms in Hausa and interprets the variety of their meanings in terms of conceptualization patterns.

References

Allan, K., 1995, “The anthropocentricity of the English word(s) back”, Cognitive Linguistics 6-1, 11-31.

Behrens, L., 1999. “Aspects of polysemy”, in: D. A. Cruse, F. Hundsnurscher, M. Job. P. R. Lutzeier (eds.), Lexicologie – Lexicology, vol. 1, Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.

Bilkova, I. 2000, Czech and English Idioms of Body Parts: A view from cognitive semantics, Ph.D. Thesis, University of Glasgow.

Croft, W., Cruise, D.A., 2004, Cognitive Linguistics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Deignan, A. and Potter L., 2004, “A corpus study of metaphors and metonymies in English and Italian”, Journal of Pragmatics 36/7, 1231-1252.

Delano, O., 1958, Atumo ede Yoruba. Short dictionary and grammar of the Yoruba language, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Dirven, R., 2002, “Metonymy and metaphor: Different mental strategies of conceptualization”, in: R. Dirven, R. Pörings (eds.), Metaphor and metonymy in comparison and contrast, Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter, 75-111.

Fillmore, C.J., Atkins, B.T.S., 2000, “Describing polysemy: The case of crawl”, in: C. Livestock (ed.), Polysemy: Theoretical and computational approaches, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 91-110.

Gbadegesin, S., 2003, “Eniyan, The Yoruba concept of a person”, in: P.H. Coetzee and A.P.J. Roux (eds.), The African Philosophy Reader (2nd ed.), 175-191. (The study originally appeared under the same title in: Gbadegesin, S., 1991, African Philosophy: Traditional Yoruba philosophy and contemporary African realities, New York: Peter Lang, 27-59).

Heine, B., Claudi U., Hünnemeyer F., 1991, Grammaticalization: A conceptual framework, Chicago: University of Chicago Press

Hilpert, M., “Chained metonymies in lexicon and grammar: A cross-linguistic perspective on body-part terms”, in: G. Radden et. al. (eds.) Constructing meaning, Amsterdam: John Benjamins (to appear).

Ibarretxe-Antuñano, I., 2006, “Cross-linguistic Polysemy in Tactile Verbs”, in: J. Luchjenbroers (ed.), Cognitive linguistics investigations across languages, fields, and philosophical boundaries, Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 235-253.

Ibarretxe-Antuñano, I., 1991, Polysemy and metaphor in per-ception verbs: A cross-linguistic study, Ph.D. Thesis, University of Edinburgh.

Lakoff, G., 1987, Women, Fire and Dangerous Things. What Cate-gories Reveal about the Mind, Chicago: Chicago University Press.

Lakoff, G., Johnson M., 1980, Metaphors We Live By, Chicago: Chi-cago University Press.

Lakoff, G., Johnson, M., 1999, Philosophy in the Flesh: the Embodied Mind and its Challenge to Western Thought, New York: Basic Books.

Niemeier, S., 2000, “Straight from the heart metonymy and metaphorical explanations”, in: A. Barcelona (ed.), Metaphor and metonymy at the crossroads. A cognitive perspective, Berlin: Mouton de Guyter, 195-213.

Oladipo, O., 1992, “The Yoruba conception of a person: An analytical philosophical study”, International Studies in Philosophy, 24, 3, 15-24.

Pawlak, N., 2005,“Conceptualization of “thinking” and “speaking” in Hausa”, in: E. Górska, G. Radden (eds.), Metonymy-Metaphor Collage, Wydawnictwa Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego, 121-142.

Petho, G., 1999, What is polysemy? A survey of current research and results, Hungary: Department of German linguistics, University of Debrecen.

Radden, G. and Kövecses Z.,1999, “Towards a theory of metonymy”, in: K.U. Panther and G. Radden (eds.) Metonymy in language and thought, Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 17-19.

Radden, G., 2001, “The folk model of ‘language’”, Metaphorik.de, 1, 80-86.

Yu, N., 2001, “What does our face mean to us?”, Pragmatics & Cognition, 10 (1/2), 341-367.

Downloads

Published

2013-12-13

How to Cite

Almajir, T. S. (2013). The polysemy of body part terms in Hausa within the frame of Image Schemas. Studies in African Languages and Cultures, (47), 93–111. Retrieved from https://salc.uw.edu.pl/index.php/SALC/article/view/93

Issue

Section

Articles